Facebook and eCommerce domination Part 1/3- Tetris, but make it $100 Billion
Facebook annouced a new product yesterday, called Shop. It is aimed at small businesses, and offers a store management and inventory system, along with a drag-and-drop website builder. It’s Shopify and Squarespace rolled into one. The best part? It works on both Facebook and Instagram.
It’s also the tip of the iceberg for Facebook as it fights for dominance on the web.
The Facebook Iceberg
Forgive the kindergarten-level drawing, but this is how I’m thinking about Shop fitting into Facebook’s catalog of concerns
There are three big parts:
- eCommerce (which we’ll focus on in this article)
- Signalling as a Service (you can skip ahead to that in Supreme Shows Us the Way)
- Strategic footholds against competitors (you can skip to Gee, Brain. What are we going to do tonight?)
These three components are related, and excelling in one gives you advantages in the other, but are meaty and discrete enough that we can tackle them in multiple articles.
Facebook and eCommerce: a long time in the works
It should go without saying, but Products take a long time to build.
Hofstadter’s Law says: It always takes longer than you expect, even when you take into account Hofstadter’s Law.
My wild guess is that Facebook first conceived of this plan 5-7 years ago, and yesterday was Day 1 of when the clock actually started on “Facebook as an eCommerce platform”.
Think about it, in order to truly build a digital storefront, Facebook would need:
- A payment processor - Pay
- Some proof of concept that people would be willing to buy things on Facebook - Marketplace
- Inventory management and reporting tools to help Sellers manage their stock - Business Manager
- Advertising tools for Sellers - Ads
- Some sort of try-on experience so Buyers can see what they’re getting - AR Studio’s Face Tracker
Oh, well I guess that settles that.
Facebook and eCommerce: not even close to finished
While Facebook’s ambitions and architecture of Shop are impressive, they are a mere sideshow when you look at China.
After several Chinese cities went on lockdown in wake of Covid-19, people feared that they would starve. But supplies flowed, primarily due to two existing pieces of infrastructure:
- “Groceries and other items purchased online can be delivered to the home within as little as 20 minutes following a purchase” thanks to Alibaba’s network of stores and delivery drivers that would, in less dire circumstances, have delivered single meals
- “Consumer comfort with the online world”. If you have any family members in China, you very likely know about WeChat: the Borg-like mega-app that allows you to do anything. It has 1.2B Monthly Active Users. While it started as a messenger app, it quickly grew to offer services such as: loans; SIM Card top-up; water/electricy bill payment; booking a taxi; buying movie tickets; even renting an apartment. In China, mobile purchases account for 80% of ecommerce transactions. In the US, that number is 28%
I think Facebook wants to build the WeChat for the Western world.
One of the big blocks they’re still missing is a network of delivery drivers, but they have the building blocks for that with the Share Location feature in Messenger. I also wouldn’t be surprised if they’re plotting how to acquire or step into the delivery network that certain rideshare apps have developed.
Next up: how eCommerce fits into Facebook users’ lives with Signalling as a Service
In this article, we’ve discussed the long road that Facebook took to get to yesterday, where they could announce that Shops was live. We also talked about the long road ahead of them before they can become the WeChat of the West.
In looking at this investment, you might expect Shops to take a large commission from Sellers. However, Facebook is not charging anything other than the basic payment processing fee, which a Seller would have to pay WITHOUT Shops.
In the next article, we’ll talk about why.